Saturday, December 10, 2005
okie. fine. i thot it's the end of my blogging for todae earlier on whn i did the "perhaps love" post. aniwae, nice pic rite? haas. tht forever yandao takeshi kaneshiro. muahahahas.
juz as usual, i did my blog hopping routine. oni to realise tht i've been soo lagged frm the latest political crisis singapore's facing. the hanging of the australian drug trafficker. so, bqt-ing reli gets u awy frm the outside wrld man. heh'.
so, wht intrigued mi into tis entry is tht i haf frens who actually read into tht case and share the same views! both wif dif. perspective thou.
boon chin &
wanni. do read it. haas.
and def., i'm gna chip in. lol. true larh. hanging someone is a terrible ting to do. imagine u die of suffocation? but, wait. hasn't it always been v.CLEAR to evryone tht drug trafficking in s'pore = DEATH ? which idiot on earth hasn't hrd of tis LAW we stick to at all? it's an incorrigible act okie?
i've owis thot of australia as a country full of lorve and bloody whtevr. NICE pple, irregardless of the mani times i hrd tht tey look dwn on chinese. fine! who cares aniwae? but, tis time rd, tey haf totally disappointed mi by plaein' the childish role in tis whle tingy.
wht for protest whn u haven't educated ya pple well? and let's sae, if singapore decides to NORT hang tht guy due to the protests (or rather REQUESTS) made by australians, INCLUDING the pm, does tis mean tht, HEY! u ain't tht strict afterall. so long as we "negotiate" wif u tings will fade awy and we get awy scot-free.
which means, we ain't firm at all. isn't it unfair to all thse (let's juz include SINGAPOREANS) who haf been found guilty of drug trafficking and been hung?
it's juz like, whn we go to skool late, we get punished by going for detention classes. whn we report late to wrk, we get our pay docked. so, the law in singapore clearly states DEATH for drug trafficking. 0.05gm is terrible oreadi isit? (if i'm nort wrng) wht's more, tht guy brought in 400gm! take note of the ratio.!
he deserves death?! yes. in the eyes of law. and singapore has oreadi been v.kind to allow his family members to haf minimal body contact wif him. WHICH law offender has evr had tis kinda treatment at all? it's oreadi v.face giving to the austrailan govt. okie? so, i don't see the pt why we're somehw being ostracized. bahhs.
my brains aren't able to juice out animore nw. i haf alot to rant. but i dunno why i can't seem to as of nw. so, i'll be back!
in anicase, PLS DO NOT TAKE INTO OFFENCE FOR THIS ABOVE POST. lols. juz incase, the v.nxt moment u see mi and my above 2 frens in court. *touchwood*. haas.
it's sooo stupid!
______________________________________contradicted yet agn at
4:17 am ;
